Sunday, May 23, 2010
3G Auction Ended
However, no single operator managed to bag all 22 circles on offer — the total bid price for which touched Rs 16,750.58 crore on the 34th day of bidding today.
Anil Ambani-led RCom will pay Rs 8,585.04 crore towards the 3G licence, but the single largest outgo would be from Bharti that will pay Rs 12,295.46 crore.
Vodafone, which is second in terms of fee outgo, would be paying over Rs 11,617 crore for licence to offer high-speed voice and data service in nine circles.
Key circles Mumbai and Delhi went to Bharti, Vodafone and RCom.
Bharti complained that the auction format and severe shortage drove up the prices beyond reasonable levels.
The government had fixed a reserve price of Rs 3,500 crore for 3G spectrum and had originally estimated to raise Rs 35,000 crore from the sale.
"We would like to point out that the auction format and severe spectrum shortage, along with ensuing policy uncertainty, drove the prices beyond reasonable levels. As a result, we could not achieve our objective of pan-India 3G footprint in this round," Bharti said in a statement.
Nine operators, who were in the fray for three-four slots of spectrum, had welcomed the format in the mock auction.
"They knew what they were bidding. I'm quite certain we should respect the market determined price," telecom regulator J S Sarma said.
"I calculated Rs 35,000 crore (revenue from 3G and Broadband Wireless spectrum sale) in the Budget. I'm getting Rs 67,000 crore, almost double. So, (I will get) that much elbow room," Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee said today.
The revenue mop up will help the government cut its fiscal deficit to nearly 4.9 per cent from 5.5 per cent of GDP projected in the Budget.
"I'm happy to see that the government is going to earn more than expected," Telecom Minister A Raja said.
Delhi spectrum went for Rs 3,316.93 crore, while that the bid for Mumbai closed at Rs 3,247.07 crore.
The auction of Broadband Wireless Access spectrum will start in two days and could push up the government's revenue mop up. The reserve price for BWA radio waves is Rs 1,750 crore for pan-India licence and 11 players are in the fray to grab the two slots on the block.
Sunday, April 25, 2010
GPRS UNLIMITED WAR
Unlimited pack | Other pack (taken maximum free usage) | Post free usage charge | |
Aircel | Rs 98, 30 days Rs 14,3 days | N/A | N/A |
MTNL(2G) | Rs 98, 30 days Rs 14, 3 days | N/A | N/A |
Airtel | N/A | Rs 98, 2GB,30 daysRs 23, 200MB,3 days | 30p/50KB |
BSNL(2G) | Rs 274, 30 days | Rs.219 ,1 GB (day)- 4 GB (night), 30 days | 1p/10KB |
Tata Docomo | N/A | Rs 95, 200MB (day)- 4 GB (night), 30 days | 50p/MB |
Uninor | N/A | Rs90, 3GB,30 daysRs9, 60MB,3 days | 10p/10KB |
Sunday, April 4, 2010
ZTE Corporation Appoints New President
Mr. Shi Lirong and his new management team will adhere to the strategic direction defined by the board of directors and strive to continue growing all areas of ZTE’s businesses. They will focus on analysing changes in the global telecom market, driving innovation and high-quality products in the wireless/wireline and handset markets, and satisfying the dynamic and individual needs of ZTE customers. In addition, the team will leverage the opportunities enabled by the 3G and 4G eras, to make further inroads into the European and U.S. markets. It will also strive to continuously improve the Company’s profits and operational efficiency, execute management duties entrusted by the board, and return strong achievements to shareholders and staff.
“We are very pleased to announce Mr. Shi Lirong as the new President of ZTE,” said Mr. Hou Weigui, Chairman of ZTE. “We are very confident that Mr. Shi, with his profound knowledge and experience in comprehensive fields ranging from technology, research & development, production management and long-term global marketing system, is capable of driving ZTE to the next level of success on the international business stage.”
3G & BWA Auction Analysis
And most have also put their names down for the separate BWA (broadband wireless access) spectrum auction, too. Until this week, that auction looked to be the domain of the WiMax hopefuls. Now, though, there's a mix of potential technologies that could be deployed in the 2.3GHz band, including TD-Long Term Evolution (LTE).
The large international service providers that had been identified as potential bidders for 3G spectrum in India, such as AT&T Inc. (NYSE: T), BT Group plc (NYSE: BT; London: BTA), and Telstra Corp. (Pink Sheets: TLSYY), have not applied.
Foreign interest in India's new spectrum is limited to those companies that already hold stakes in local operators, such as Vodafone Group plc (NYSE: VOD), Etisalat , Maxis Communications Bhd. of Malaysia, which has a majority stake in Aircel Ltd. , and Bahrain Telecommunications Co. (Batelco) , an investor in startup operator S Tel Pvt. Ltd.
In addition, Augere Holdings, which offers wireless broadband services in Pakistan and Bangladesh, has created a new subsidiary to apply for a place in the BWA auction, and one of its financial backers is France Telecom SA (NYSE: FTE).
Rush for 3G
Reliance Communications Ltd. , Vodafone Essar , Tata Teleservices Ltd. , IDEA Cellular Ltd. , and Aircel have all filed to take part in the auction of 3G spectrum, along with minnow S Tel (which only operates in three circles).
New entrants Etisalat DB, which has yet to launch its GSM services, and Videocon Telecommunications Ltd. (a.k.a. Datacom Solutions), which has just launched its first GSM services in the Tamil Nadu circle, have also submitted applications, though it's not known currently whether they have applied to bid in all 22 circles or just in select areas. (See table below.)
Table 1: Applicants for India's 3G Spectrum Auction
Name
Number of current mobile customers (at end of January 2010)
Bharti Airtel
121.7 million
Reliance Communications
96.6 million
Vodafone Essar
94.1 million
Tata Teleservices
60.3 million
IDEA Cellular
59.9 million
Aircel
33 million
S Tel
0.5 million
Videocon Telecommunications
Just launched 2G service
Etisalat DB Telecom
Not yet launched 2G service
Source: India's Department of Telecom
And they're all after a limited resource that the operators need to meet the ongoing demand for mobile connections (almost 20 million new lines are being activated each month): In most of India's circles, only three slots of 2.1GHz spectrum are up for grabs in the auction, while a handful of rural circles have a fourth slot. (See India Watch: The Road to 3G to check out what spectrum is being auctioned, and A Guide to India's Telecom Market to find out about India's circles.)
With so many bidders, and at least five operators (Bharti, Reliance, Vodafone Essar, Tata Teleservices, and Etisalat DB) seeking a pan-India license covering all 22 circles (service areas), fierce bidding is expected. According to industry sources, although the reserve price for a pan-Indian license is 35 billion Indian Rupees (US$769 million), bids of more than $1 billion might be required to win slots in the 2.1GHz band countrywide.
Not all of India's mobile operators are applying for 3G spectrum, though.
In line with its strategy to focus more on developing its current voice services, new entrant Uninor , which has signed up a few million subscribers since it launched in December 2009, has not applied. (See Interview: Rajiv Bawa, EVP Corporate Affairs, Uninor and Uninor Launches in India.)
Another relative newcomer, CDMA operator Sistema Shyam TeleServices Ltd. (MTS India), has also decided not to take part in the auction. Loop Telecom Pvt. Ltd. , a mobile operator with 2.7 million customers in Mumbai, has also stayed away from the auction process.
State-owned carriers Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL) and Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. (MTNL) don't need to participate in the auction process as they already have their 3G spectrum and will be awarded BWA airwaves, too.
BWA auction attracts multiple bidders
As well as applying to take part in the 3G spectrum (2.1GHz) auction, Bharti Airtel, Reliance, Vodafone Essar, IDEA, and Aircel have put themselves forward for the BWA auction, suggesting that they view the 2.3GHz band as useful to deliver data services.
Other bidders for the BWA airwaves include Qualcomm Inc. (Nasdaq: QCOM), which stirred up the market this week with its application, enterprise and wholesale communications giant Tata Communications Ltd. (NYSE: TCL) (sister company to Tata Teleservices), and a number of ISPs. (See table below.)
Table 2: Applicants for India's BWA (Broadband Wireless Access) Spectrum Auction
Name (in alphabetical order)
Company type
Aircel Mobile operator
Augere (Mauritius)Wireless Internet service provider (WISP)
Bharti Airtel Mobile operator
Idea Cellular Mobile operator
Infotel Broadband Services Internet service provider (ISP)
Qualcomm Wireless technology vendor
Reliance WiMax WiMax division of Reliance Communications
Spice Internet ISP
Tata Communications Business communications service provider
Tikona Digital Networks WISP
Vodafone Essar Mobile operator
Source: India's Department of Telecom
The list means there are a number of potential technologies being considered for use in the 2.3GHz band. Qualcomm is pushing TD-LTE, while Augere, Tata Communications, and Reliance WiMax all lean towards WiMax. Tikona Digital Networks, meanwhile, uses Wi-Bro to deliver its services in large Indian cities such as Delhi, Mumbai, and Bangalore.
Tata Communications "plans to bid for [BWA] spectrum in all circles," the operator's senior vice president of corporate strategy, Srinivasa Addepalli, tells Light Reading Asia. "Tata Communications considers wireless to be the best option to rapidly increase broadband penetration in India. We will finalize our funding plans for the broadband business, including evaluating the option of a strategic investor, after the completion of the auction."
Spectrum Auction & Equipment Market Competition
In the meantime, 2G is where all the current growth is, and Ericsson AB (Nasdaq: ERIC) has landed itself a $1.3 billion deal to help India's mobile market leader bolster its existing network and prepare for 3G. (See Ericsson takes away major Airtel 3G deployment.)
Spectrum bid battle shapes up
India's Department of Telecommunications has pre-approved all of the companies that submitted applications to take part in April's 3G and BWA (broadband wireless access) spectrum auctions. (See Bids Flood In for India's Spectrum Auctions.)
And it's possible to tell from the pre-qualification data (specifically, the size of the upfront deposit) which of the hopefuls are planning to bid for pan-India spectrum -- that is, bid for spectrum across all of India's 22 "circles" (service areas).
In the 3G auction -- for spectrum in the 2.1GHz band -- six of the nine bidders have pan-India aspirations: Aircel Ltd. , Bharti Airtel Ltd. (Mumbai: BHARTIARTL), IDEA Cellular Ltd. , Reliance Communications Ltd. , Tata Teleservices Ltd. , and Vodafone Essar .
Etisalat DB Telecom, which is yet to launch its 2G services, is to bid in a majority, but not all, of the circles, while S Tel Pvt. Ltd. and Videocon Telecommunications are set to bid in a small number of select circles.
In the BWA auction -- for spectrum in the 2.3GHz band -- eight of the 11 pre-qualified firms are looking to pick up countrywide airwaves: Aircel, Bharti Airtel, Idea Cellular, Infotel Broadband Services, Qualcomm Inc. (Nasdaq: QCOM), Reliance Wimax, Tata Communications Ltd. (NYSE: TCL), and Vodafone Essar. (See Qualcomm Unveils LTE Plans for India.)
Internet service providers Augere (Mauritius), Spice Internet, and Tikona Digital Networks are set to bid in select circles.
Bharti puts big bucks into 2G
With its subscriber base at 124.6 million (end of February) and growing at nearly 3 million per month, Bharti Airtel is expanding its network, and preparing its infrastructure for the arrival of 3G (so it's confident of emerging from the auction with some spectrum in the bag!).
As part of those efforts, the carrier has awarded Ericsson a $1.3 billion contract to expand and upgrade its network in 15 circles. The Swedish giant will supply: radio access network (RAN) equipment to support GSM, GPRS, and EDGE connections; circuit and packet core equipment; microwave backhaul gear; and "intelligent network" systems to support pre-paid account provisioning, activation, and service management.
The vendor states that part of its job is to "ensure that Bharti Airtel's core and transport network is 3G-ready in order to reduce time to market and enable the fast rollout of 3G services at a later date." They all hope...
Ericsson may be an incumbent provider at Bharti, but it shows how competitive the traditional suppliers can be, even in the face of increasingly stiff competition from the Chinese duo of Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. and ZTE Corp. (Shenzhen: 000063; Hong Kong: 0763).
Femtocell Market will the grow in coming years
The companies involved were Ablaze Wireless, Acme Packet, Airvana, Alcatel-Lucent Telecom, Alpha Networks, Askey Computer Corporation, C&S Microwave, Cisco Systems Inc, Contela, Continuous Computing, Genband, Huawei, IntelliNet Technologies, ip.access, Kineto Wireless, NEC, Node-H, Nokia Siemens Networks, picoChip, Technicolor, TRaC Global and Ubiquisys.
Location Based Services
Nokia Siemens Network focused of All-IP Microwave Backhaul
Nokia Siemens Networks is a leading global enabler of telecommunications services. With its focus on innovation and sustainability, the company provides a complete portfolio of mobile, fixed and converged network technology, as well as professional services including consultancy and systems integration, deployment, maintenance and managed services. It is one of the largest telecommunications hardware, software and professional services companies in the world. Operating in 150 countries, its headquarters are in Espoo, Finland. www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com
Ericsson Expansions in China
Market Future:- HSPA+ and LTE
- 451 million 3GPP mobile broadband subscriptions worldwide; 64 million in the Americas (Informa Telecoms & Media)
- 60 HSPA mobile broadband networks in 26 countries in the Americas
- HSPA 7.2 has been deployed coast-to-coast by AT&T, Rogers and T-Mobile in North America; backhaul upgrades are underway to realize the full potential of the fastest nationwide networks
- 31% of all mobile phones purchased in the United States during Q409 were smartphones, compared to only 23% in Q408 (NPD Group); 40% integrated device penetration by AT&T with wireless data traffic growth more than 5,000% over the past three years
- Average industry percentage contribution of data to overall average revenue per user in the U. S. was 29% at the end of 2009; mobile data will contribute at least 33% of the overall U.S. mobile service revenues by the end of 2010 (Chetan Sharma)
- HSPA+ has been deployed by Rogers across 41% of the Canadian population
- T-Mobile USA launched HSPA+ in Philadelphia with plans for broad national deployment in 2010
- T-Mobile USA’s webConnect Rocket™ USB Laptop Stick – the first HSPA+ device offered by a national U.S. carrier
- Operators are heavily investing in backhaul to cell sites to deliver maximum potential of HSPA and HSPA+ networks and to prepare for LTE
- TeliaSonera commercially launched LTE in Sweden and Norway in 2009; 20 commercial LTE networks are expected in 2010; 130 operators have expressed that LTE will be their future technology evolution (Informa Telecoms & Media)
Huawei Demonstrate LTE advanced 1.2Gb/sec
The demonstration utilized Huawei' s industry-leading SingleRAN prototype LTE-advanced solution with 80 MHz multi-carrier wideband radio and included following features: carrier aggregation (CA), 4x4 multi-input multi-output (MIMO), coordinated multipoint transmission (CoMP) and relay. Huawei' s SingleRAN solution supports network multi-mode convergence and evolution while reducing total cost of ownership for operators.
Ericsson Report on Data Traffic Incrment.
Ericsson takes away major Airtel 3G deployment
Under the terms of the contract, Ericsson will strengthen Bharti's GSM network in the 15 circles out of the total 22 that the company operates in.
Moreover, Ericsson will also ensure making the network of Bharti Airtel 3G ready on a real time basis. In fact, with the deal in place, it will really help the home-grown telecom operator to enable the fast rollout of 3G services at a later date.
Apart from this latest deal, World's largest telecom gears company, Ericsson recently bagged two orders from the Chinese telecom market - first being the $1 billion order from China Mobile and the $800 million contract from Chine Unicom, the two largest mobile operators operating in the Chinese market. The results of the 3G auction are expected to be out by the 9th of April in the Indian market.
Notably, Bharti recently signed a deal with the Kuwait-based Zain which will empower the Indian operator to take control of the latter's African operations.
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Vietnams New 3G Network
FDD Technical summary
Minimum frequency band required: ~ 2x5MHz
Frequency re-use: 1
Carrier Spacing: 4.4MHz - 5.2 MHz
Maximum number of (voice) channels on 2x5MHz: ~196 (spreading factor 256 UL, AMR 7.95kbps) / ~98 (spreading factor 128 UL, AMR 12.2kbps)
Voice coding: AMR codecs (4.75 kHz - 12.2 kHz, GSM EFR=12.2 kHz) and SID (1.8 kHz)
Channel coding: Convolutional coding, Turbo code for high rate data
Duplexer needed (190MHz separation), Asymmetric connection supported
Tx/Rx isolation: MS: 55dB, BS: 80dB
Receiver: Rake
Receiver sensitivity: Node B: -121dBm, Mobile -117dBm at BER of 10-3
Data type: Packet and circuit switch
Modulation: QPSK
Pulse shaping: Root raised cosine, roll-off = 0.22
Chip rate: 3.84 Mcps
Channel raster: 200 kHz
Maximum user data rate (Physical channel): ~ 2.3Mbps (spreading factor 4, parallel codes (3 DL / 6 UL), 1/2 rate coding), but interference limited.
Maximum user data rate (Offered): 384 kbps (year 2002), higher rates ( ~ 2 Mbps) in the near future. HSPDA will offer data speeds up to 8-10 Mbps (and 20 Mbps for MIMO systems)
Channel bit rate: 5.76Mbps
Frame length: 10ms (38400 chips)
Number of slots / frame: 15
Number of chips / slot: 2560 chips
Handovers: Soft, Softer, (interfrequency: Hard)
Power control period: Time slot = 1500 Hz rate
Power control step size: 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 dB (Variable)
Power control range: UL 80dB, DL 30dB
Mobile peak power: Power class 1: +33 dBm (+1dB/-3dB) = 2W; class 2 +27 dBm, class 3 +24 dBm, class 4 +21 dBm
Number of unique base station identification codes: 512 / frequency
Physical layer spreading factors: 4 ... 256 UL, 4 ... 512 DL
Thursday, March 25, 2010
Wimax Efficient than HSPA and LTE- Intel
A new whitepaper released by Intel asserts that WiMAX technology is more spectrally efficient than other mobile data technologies, resulting in advantages for operators including more subscribers per cell site and higher QOS data rates.
While large headline-grabbing theoretical/peak data rates of 50Mbps+ continue to be batted around the industry by proponents of HSPA and LTE, the more important measure is how efficiently these technologies use scarce spectrum resources. It is widely acknowledged that mobile data traffic demand will outpace the supply of actual network data capacity in the coming years, and therefore the average realized data throughput is the real metric that should be compared.
The whitepaper highlights the importance of spectral efficiency and the basics for calculating system capacity on a wireless network. The report compares mobile WiMAX 802.16e against three other technologies - HSPA (Rel 6), HSPA+ (Rel 7) and LTE (Rel 8).
According to the report, WiMAX is able to support a higher number of subscribers per cell site compared to the other technologies while supporting high QoS data rate applications. For example, using a 10MHz channel, WiMAX is able to support 20 video streaming users per sector at 256 kbps, compared to 12 users at 128 kbps on an HSPA network. Furthermore, WiMAX networks are able to support a large number of users even with high monthly data usage of 12GB per subscriber.
The complete whitepaper can be downloaded here.
Wimax Vendors
| Alvarion Ltd. - Alvarion (NASDAQ: ALVR) is the largest WiMAX pure-player with the most extensive WiMAX customer base and over 250 commercial deployments around the globe. Committed to growing the WiMAX market, the company offers solutions for a wide range of frequency bands supporting a variety of business cases. |
| Aptilo - Aptilo Networks is the global leader in integrated management solutions for control of access, user services and billing in WiMAX and Wi-Fi networks. Selected by premier business partners such as Nortel, Cisco and HP, Aptilo has become the provider of choice for service providers, enterprises and municipalities in need of a rapidly deployable, scalable multi-service solution to easily manage data and voice services over these networks. |
| Cisco - (NASDAQ: CSCO) enables people to make powerful connections-whether in business, education, philanthropy, or creativity. Cisco hardware, software, and service offerings are used to create the Internet solutions that make networks possible-providing easy access to information anywhere, at any time. |
Fujitsu - Fujitsu joined the WiMAX Forum in 2002 as a founding board member and has helped the Forum promote and certify compatibility and interoperability of broadband wireless products. Fujitsu’s semiconductor solutions are helping expand the use of high-performance, cost-effective mobile WiMAX devices. | |
| Hutton - Hutton Communications, Inc. headquartered in Dallas Texas, is a distributor of commercial wireless communications and related equipment. Hutton serves cellular and radio communications dealers, wireless communications carriers and self-maintained end users of communications systems |
| MECA Electronics, Inc. - MECA has the essential RF components needed to mesh your new WiMAX networks to existing infrastructure including Fixed Attenuators, Directional & Hybrid Couplers, Isolators/Circulators, Power Divider/Combiners, RF Loads, DC Blocks & Bias Tees. Most models available from STOCK – 2 weeks ARO. |
Samsung - Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is a global leader in semiconductor, telecommunication, digital media and digital convergence technologies. Employing approximately 138,000 people in 124 offices in 56 countries, the company consists of five main business units: Digital Media Business, LCD Business, Semiconductor Business, Telecommunication Network Business and Digital Appliance Business. | |
| TESSCO Technologies Incorporated - TESSCO supplies wireless communications and networking products and solutions to business professionals. You can choose from over 30,000 competitively-priced products from 350 manufacturers with guaranteed delivery. |
| Vecima Networks, Inc. - Vecima Networks Inc. (Vecima) is a recognized designer and manufacturer of broadband wired and wireless networks. Vecima's innovative products - including Brand Name and Original Equipment Manufacture (OEM) products - have gained wide acceptance for their superior quality and performance. |
Wimax Network:- Importance AAA
AAA stands for Authentication, Authorization and Accounting. It is a core part of a service management solution providing control of access, user services and billing in wireless and fixed networks. Many AAA solutions stop there; others on the market go much farther, offering additional values such as subscriber and session management, policy control, voucher management, advanced authentication, intelligent roaming and a more. These additional features are designed to provide a solid foundation for a growing network. They can also help differentiate a business (or service) from a crowded field.
Q) Why is AAA important? Isn't it just an "add-on" feature that comes at the end of building out a wireless service?
We have met with many prospective customers during the past years. Many of those have made the choice of AAA solution an active one, with procurement happening early in the deployment process. Making their AAA selection up-front became a fundamental component in making sure that both their current business models of today as well as future ones would be supported. In essence this is what is required to secure future success for any provider in the market.
All too often, however, we face prospective customers who for some reason have turned the selection of AAA into a non-active choice. In those cases the decision is often made very late in the process, and frequently based on only a very few main criteria, such as number of authentications per second. Even though this of course is an important parameter, making a AAA decision based solely on this single aspect can be fatal for your business, with significant limitations as a consequence.
You could compare it to buying a car using the amount of horsepower as your only selection criteria and then hitting the nearest highway, without even thinking about what your vehicle should be used for or where you want to go. The AAA service management solution should more be regarded as the dashboard of the car combined with a steering wheel, accelerator and brakes, indicators and GPS system. It is in essence where services are defined and personalized, and policies enforced to control which users access the Internet, their service level and billing. In other words AAA should be regarded as your most important node when it comes to defining exactly what services you want to bring to your customers. With this in mind there is no question that AAA should be one of your first thoughts; certainly not a forgotten item.
One should never underestimate the importance of starting with the business aspects and goals, and make the best possible attempt to outline the short- and long-term commercial models, as this can have a direct impact on the entire network and radio equipment selection. Some vendors may simply have difficulty technically supporting the business models you want to implement. So, start with the business aspect of your services and do not settle with only the core functions. While these core functions might be obvious at first thought, it is important to go beyond that to seek the functionality that can really make a difference for your business.
Q) What features do AAA and service management offer that are relevant to today's changing market, specifically for WiMAX?
WiMAX has of course been very inspired by the mobile/cellular world when it comes to technology including its well-defined standard nodes and licensed spectrum. However, it has also been affected by the Wi-Fi hotspot and fixed broadband markets when it comes to business models. The need to deploy nomadic and online signup-types of business models is increasing by the fast-growing number of WiMAX-embedded devices on the market. Developing countries have proven to be the strongest market for WiMAX. In many of these markets it's just not feasible to send an invoice at the end of the month, the credit risk is often all too high.
Instead operators are looking at prepaid business models similar to those used with Wi-Fi hotspots. A complicating factor is that in many of these markets the use of credit cards is not a viable alternative either, so the ability to offer different alternatives with prepaid, including scratch cards and refill of prepaid accounts through ATM machines is a must. It is therefore important to choose a AAA solution with well thought-out APIs and the flexibility to seamlessly integrate with different external payment support systems e.g. an ATM machine-based refill solution.
Interoperability in a changing wireless landscape is also an important feature that a well-built AAA solution can address. There are many existing fixed broadband Internet ISPs deploying WiMAX as a mobile alternative for their clients. They all have some sort of legacy AAA or LDAP user database that cannot support the new WiMAX installation. One option is to implement a new network for the WiMAX deployment with all the back-end systems in parallel with the existing network. This is a costly approach with product investments, the need to build up know-how for the new systems and additional operational costs for running two different parallel solutions.
Fortunately there are AAA vendors that go beyond basic AAA and offer a solution that makes the WiMAX network interoperable with the legacy AAA or LDAP database. One such an example is the Aptilo WiMAX Legacy Connector™ which mediates between the WiMAX-specific AAA attributes and the legacy user database, making it possible to just "plug-in" a WiMAX network on top of the existing legacy ISP back-end.
Q) What is needed in a AAA solution to support next-generation WiMAX services?
A good AAA solution will have interfaces that allow an application to trigger a Change of Authorization (CoA) request to, for instance, increase the bandwidth temporarily for a user. One example of the type of application where this would be a tremendous benefit is next-generation WiMAX services such as Video-on-demand (VoD), where a VoD server can trigger an increase of the bandwidth when a user decides to watch a movie. The only way to accommodate this is to have a AAA solution that is flexible enough to allow a CoA request from the VoD server over the Internet through some sort of provisioning interface. The same interface could potentially also be used for provisioning of new users from external portals or over-the-air OMA-DM systems.
Intercompany Unified Communications Calls Over Internet
The business-to-business discussions included calls between Cisco and Australian-based Queensland Rail, and between Cisco and the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater. Through Cisco IME, all participants were able to spontaneously, simultaneously and with high security enjoy enterprise video and high-fidelity wideband audio from their video-enabled devices by simply dialing standard phone numbers.
Built on proposed standards that Cisco has submitted to the Internet Engineering Task Force, Cisco IME enables companies to conduct highly secure, high-quality, voice and video telephone calls between companies across the Internet using their existing telephone numbers without the need to re-provision or replace currently deployed infrastructure.
Cisco IME is designed to increase collaboration throughout value chains. As businesses increasingly engage with a variety of external communities and rely upon their trusted partners to deliver results, the need to better collaborate across corporate network boundaries is paramount. The goal of Cisco IME is to allow organizations already realizing the benefits of video telephony and other advanced unified communications features internally to now extend those capabilities externally to similarly equipped customers, suppliers and strategic partners.
Cisco IME is based on a "self-learning" technology, one that learns new routes based on calling patterns and automatically recognizes when users are operating in an IME-equipped network. It discovers and manages all aspects of facilitating highly secure, high-quality, low-cost call routing via IP networks including the Internet making the experience easy to use for both users and administrators alike.
The technology allows end users to more effectively communicate using body language through video, as well as optimized voice technology, while at the same time helping to reduce costs. Additionally, services from Cisco and its partners can help ensure customers derive the greatest possible return from the technology and experience better collaboration across network boundaries. Cisco said IME builds on its history of providing solutions across its collaboration portfolio that foster business-to-business collaboration, including offerings from Cisco TelePresence and Cisco WebEx.
Top 10 Techonology set to evolve in 2011- by Gartner
Gartner Inc. has identified 10 mobile technologies that will evolve significantly through 2011 in ways that will impact short-term mobile strategies and policies. Investments in mobile applications and technologies will increase through 2011 as organizations emerge from the recession and ramp up both business-to-employee (B2E) and business-to-consumer (B2C) mobile spending.
"We are highlighting these 10 mobile technologies that should be on every organization's radar screen," said Nick Jones, vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner. "These mobile technologies were selected because they will evolve in ways that affect corporate strategies, significant numbers of customers or employees will adopt or expect them, or they will address particular mobile challenges that organizations will face through 2011."
|
Bluetooth (3 and 4)
Two new Bluetooth versions will emerge by 2011: Bluetooth 3 will introduce 802.11 as a bearer for faster data transmission, and Bluetooth 4 will introduce a new low-energy (LE) mode that will enable communication with external peripherals and sensors. Both versions will include other technical improvements to improve battery life and security. Gartner believes that Bluetooth 3 will facilitate corporate and consumer functions demanding large bandwidth (e.g., downloading images and videos from handsets). Bluetooth LE will enable a range of new sensor-based business models in industries such as fitness, healthcare and environmental control and will be used by handset and PC peripherals to enable new functions, such as PCs that autolock when users move away from them.
The Mobile Web
By 2011, over 85% of handsets shipped globally will include some form of browser. In mature markets, such as Western Europe and Japan, around 60% of handsets shipped will be smartphones with sophisticated browsing capability and the ability to render conventional HTML sites in some manner. The growth in smartphones with relatively large and high-resolution screens will encourage greater numbers of people to access conventional websites on mobile devices, and will make it possible to deliver some B2C applications using conventional Web tools without adaptation. In mature markets, the mobile Web, along with associated Web adaptation tools, will be a leading technology for B2C mobile applications through 2012, and should be part of every organization's B2C technology portfolio.
Mobile Widgets
Platform-Independent Mobile AD Tools
Mobile platforms will become more diverse through 2012 although consolidation will not have started, and, in some markets, five or more platforms may have a significant presence. Therefore, tools that can reduce the burden of delivering installable applications to several platforms will be very attractive. Platform-independent application development (AD) tools cannot deliver a "write once, run anywhere" equivalent to native code; however, they can significantly reduce the cost of delivering and supporting multiplatform applications that provide a more sophisticated experience than the mobile Web and operate outside signal coverage.
App Stores
App stores will be the primary (and, in some cases, the only) way to distribute applications to smartphones and other mobile devices. App stores also provide a range of business support functions, such as payment processing, that assist smaller organizations. Gartner believes that app stores will play many roles in an organization's B2C and B2E strategies. They will be a distribution channel for mobile applications and a commercial channel to sell applications and content (especially in international markets), and they will provide new options for application sourcing. Many applications will exploit ecosystem cloud services.
Enhanced Location Awareness
By the end of 2011, over 75 percent of devices shipped in mature markets will include a GPS. GPS will be the primary, but not the only, means of establishing handset location. Wi-Fi and cell ID systems will remain important in situations where GPS is unavailable or unreliable. The popularity of location-aware handsets will enable a wide range of B2E and B2C location-aware applications, and will serve as a foundation for more-sophisticated contextual applications in the future. However, organizations must be sensitive to local privacy regulations, ensure that applications that expose location are "opt in", and remain on alert for new risks and concerns that will be raised by location awareness.
Cellular Broadband
During 2010 and 2011, the availability of multimegabit wireless broadband performance will continue to grow as mobile networks enhance their broadband performance. Continuous improvements in wireless broadband performance will increase the range of applications that no longer require fixed networking, and make cellular broadband a more effective fallback when fixed connections fail. Embedded cellular networking will become a standard feature of many corporate laptops, and will enable new types of network-connected devices and business models, such as e-books and media players.
|
Touchscreens are emerging as the dominant user interface for large-screen handsets, and will be included in over 60% of mobile devices shipped in Western Europe and North America in 2011. Touch-enabled devices will also make increasing use of techniques such as haptics to enhance user experience. Organizations developing native handset applications may need to exploit single and multitouch interfaces and haptics to give their applications a compelling and competitive user experience.
M2M
Many network service providers increased their commitment to machine to machine (M2M) in 2009, so a good range of both national and multinational M2M service options will be available in mature markets during 2010 and 2011. Although the M2M market is very fragmented, it's growing at over 30% per year. Low-cost M2M modules will enable a wide range of new networked devices and business models. Key applications include smart grid, meter reading, security/surveillance, automotive systems, vending and point of sale, remote monitoring, and track and trace.
Device-Independent Security
This isn't strictly a single technology, but refers to a collection of security technologies, application technologies and sourcing options that enable the provisioning of applications that are secure, but less tightly tied to specific devices and platforms, and that, in many cases, do not require security tools to be installed on the client. It includes thin-client architectures, applications as a service, platform-independent forms of network access control (NAC), portable personality, virtualization, and hosted security services, such as "in the cloud" virus scanning. Device-independent tools cannot provide the rigor of fully installed security, but a blend of several of these tools can enable CIOs to deliver applications that can run on a wider range of devices while reducing security risks.
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
IPV6 Myths
Myth #1: IPv6 networking provides service/location separation
Reality: Totally bogus.
A broken protocol stack and a broken reference implementation are among the biggest issues the Internet is facing today. Both require an application to take a service name, translate it into a network address and establish a connection to that address. Burdened with a transport protocol (TCP) that still lives in the dial-up world, the applications simply cannot cope with a service that is available on multiple network locations.
The IPv6 networking protocol could have solved this problem if its architects hadn't limited themselves to the single goal of extending address length. In its current incarnation, IPv6 gives us a longer address and nothing more.
Myth #2: IPv6 will simplify multihoming
Reality: Missed opportunity.
The designers of IPv6 took multihoming seriously and developed a protocol in which a single host can easily acquire multiple IPv6 addresses, even from address spaces belonging to multiple upstream service providers. Unfortunately, they've never tested their theories in real life. Having multiple IPv6 addresses does not help if the upper layers cannot use them efficiently (see previous myth).
Technologies that could support efficient multihoming with IPv6 are already available (SHIM and SCTP, for example) but not widely used because it's easier for everyone to grab a provider-independent (PI) chunk of address space and pollute the global Internet routing tables.
Without an extra layer between the IPv6 addresses and the applications, the multihoming of e-commerce servers in the IPv6 world remains identical to IPv4 multihoming, and providing resilience to smaller client sites actually gets harder because IPv6 does not have Network Address Translation (NAT).
Myth #3: IPv6 will reduce IP routing tables and BGP problems
Reality: Missed opportunity.
The architects of IPv6 envisioned a strictly hierarchical address space in which every service provider would get huge amounts of address space and advertise only a few prefixes into the global routing tables. Unfortunately, they've never considered the high-availability requirements of e-commerce
The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) had 15 years to address multihoming issues but failed to do so (see the previous myth). The only solution available to anyone who wants to be somewhat independent of a single service provider is to get a chunk of PI address space, run the border gateway protocol (BGP) and advertise the PI prefix to the global Internet. If anything, the routing tables will grow exponentially with the introduction of IPv6, as everyone will try to get PI address space. BGP will fare even worse. Not only will the size of the IPv6 global routing table increase, IPv6 BGP tables use more space (and more bandwidth) than the corresponding IPv4 BGP tables. Last but not least, you should also consider what happens in the IPv6 transition period, when the routers will have to carry both IPv4 and IPv6 prefixes for the same set of end-user equipment. Myth #4: IPv6 has better Quality of Service (QoS) IPv6 packet headers have a flow field designed to identify individual flows, which might be useful on low-speed links. On a decently fast link, you're forced to use class-based QoS (DiffServ) which uses DSCP field in the packet header, as the flow-based QoS (IntServ) does not scale. DSCP field is available in both IPv4 and IPv6 headers. Myth #5: IPv6 has better security IPSec might be better integrated in IPv6 headers, but there's nothing you can do with IPv6 IPSec that you cannot do with IPv4 IPSec. Myth #6: IPv6 is required for mobility When IPv6 was designed, IPv4 did not provide any IP mobility features. The lack of IPv6 networking deployment has prompted the development of IPv4 mobility solutions. Today, it's not hard to implement IPv4-based mobility. It is true, however, that the explosive growth of mobile devices requires enormous amounts of address space that cannot be provided with the IPv4 addresses. Myth #7: Residential IPv6 is less secure because it does not require NAT Some engineers think that the NAT commonly used in residential CPE devices provides extra security owing to obfuscation of actual IP addresses of the hosts behind the CPE device. Enterprise-grade NAT implementations (available, for example, in Cisco IOS) provide security somewhat equivalent to a stateful packet inspection, but consumer-grade NAT available in most CPE devices does not. Scanning the IPv6 address space looking for vulnerable hosts (a common hacker pastime) is totally useless in the IPv6 networking world. Using the current best practices, each consumer will get the equivalent of a billion's worth of today's Internet's addresses. Even if your workstation sits behind an unprotected CPE, finding it from afar would be quite a feat. Furthermore, every modern operating system contains basic firewall capabilities (for example, the ability to block unwanted incoming sessions) that to some degree augment the functionality provided by CPE devices. Last but not least, if residential security becomes an issue, the market will force even the low-cost CPE vendors to implement some basic filters to protect the end users.
Reality: Obsolete.
Reality: Not true.
Reality: No longer true.
Reality: Ignorance.
Issues in Evovled Packet Core
Evolved Packet Core Issue #1: LTE data services
In mature mobile markets, there has been a 4G technology divide, with WiMAX services aimed predominantly at data service models, and LTE evolving out of current 3G mobile services, whose initial mission was voice. That said, given how strong a technology LTE is for delivering data services, shouldn't it also be focused on data opportunities?
Most operators believe it should be. LTE planners say that it is critical to plan 4G LTE network deployment in terms of data services, which is why EPC planning is so important. If EPC principles are followed, then mobility management and registration are easily linked to IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) service control, and LTE voice services can be added as a control layer. The impact of voice traffic on the data plane would then be minimal.
Evolved Packet Core Issue #2: Networking the towers
Since 4G LTE network capacity per cell is 10 times or more the capacity of 3G technology, fully exploiting its benefits probably requires fiber-to-the-tower technology. The question is then about where the fiber should connect. The traditional method is to backhaul fiber to the local central office (CO)
deployments, that would create an aggregation issue in central offices, which would only increases the CO requirement for fiber capacity outward to service points. So is the traditional approach the right one?
Operators have a growing conviction that the metro topology of EPC should create a series of wireless aggregation points to which fiber from the towers is homed. This is most practical in dense metro areas, of course, but as long as utility fiber or right-of-way is available, creating fiber paths from the tower to a node close to the service points for voice and data improves performance and Quality of Service (QoS) control.
Evolved Packet Core Issue #3: Mobile security
The advent of smart mobile devices generates a risk that mobile appliances could be used to attack one another, elements of the infrastructure, or even wireline sites, given higher mobile bandwidth. Mobile services also expose operators to the risk that customer information and location might be revealed and used in illegal activity. The question is whether to push mobile security as an appliance or a network issue.
Operators seem to agree that mobile security is a network issue, but they also recognize that many mobile applications (phone-as-credit-card, for example) demand a high level of handset/appliance security. Operators are looking for a service-based security system for mobile that lives in the network and can be extended via hotspots, femtocells and home services into the wireline space. Virtually all operators see this as a layer beyond EPC and IMS because it is most significant for Internet-based services.
Evolved Packet Core Issue #4: QoS and traffic management
While there is long-standing operator conviction that QoS is a major service differentiator, two emerging trends seem to counter that notion. First, the Internet has conditioned users to best-effort services, reducing the premium they'll pay for QoS. Second, regulators are wrestling with questions of net neutrality that may influence whether operators could charge for premium handling.
Most operators believe that traffic management for mobile networks will be an essential part of providing reasonable service quality to all, but they are concerned whether traffic management applications to provide premium handling will be profitable and acceptable. They are most likely to invest in approaches that are cost-effective in managing traffic at the level needed to assure network stability but are also expanded in scope to supply premium handling where it is legal and profitable. Most believe that EPC tunnel management provides the needed transport facilities but that registration and application security will be needed to link traffic flows with service policies.
Evolved Packet Core Issue #5: App developer programs
The last issue focuses on developer programs and mobile services. Operators have been impressed (and sometimes annoyed) at the success of application stores like the one Apple launched with its iPhone. They are also worried that a highly competitive smartphone and data appliance market may sap their own opportunities to provide premium mobile services. To offer application stores without differentiated applications to sell seems like a waste of an opportunity. But where can differentiation be created?
Most operators believe that exposing some service assets through developer programs and software tool kits is essential, but they are very concerned that exposure could threaten network stability. Operators consider some mechanism to isolate basic EPC processes from developers through a gateway to be essential in protecting service experiences to the user. Operators are working with equipment vendors to create the right model.
Using operator views as a guide
4G LTE network infrastructure planners should use operator consensus as a guideline in their own planning, recognizing that every mobile operator has a unique market and business model, unique regulatory oversight and unique current network infrastructure commitments. The best answers from the industry are only policy guidelines to be used in creating the best answer for your own company.
Evolved Packet Core for 3G/4G
majority of wireless traffic rides traditional wireline copper and fiber facilities for most of its trip from originator to destination. But for the portion of the network that is wireless, data services growth on 3G networks has created a mobile backhaul problem in terms of transporting this traffic to or from the wireline network to the user.
For 4G Long Term Evolution (LTE) services, the new Evolved Packet Core (EPC) gives operators an architectural advantage for transporting wireless traffic. Yet for operators deploying LTE from a 3G service-base, evolving 3G mobile backhaul to EPC may be as big a planning issue as evolving 3G radio networks and handsets to 4G.
Transport infrastructure for 3G and 4G services can be divided into two categories:
- Mobile service elements with components that are aware of registration, mobility and service control aspects of mobile services;
- Transport/backhaul elements that provide connectivity between tower locations and service points.
Making sure mobile backhaul accommodates both 3G and 4G services
Both mobile service and transport/backhaul elements must be evolved in harmony so they can transition between 3G and 4G services
Mobile backhaul and 3G transport strategies vary depending on exactly what kind of 3G services are used (e.g., EDGE, HSPA, CDMA). In practice, however, most operators have deployed either time-division multiplexing (TDM) or asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) (AAL2) backhaul facilities to take advantage of their metro infrastructure and core technology.
This backhaul structure must be migrated to EPC during the evolution to 4G, and since fiber-feeding the tower sites is the preferred approach to 4G deployment, either parallel TDM/Ethernet or TDM over Ethernet Pseudowire Emulation Edge-to-Edge) is likely to be deployed.
The question of integrating TDM backhaul for 3G with LTE/4G backhaul, which is also appropriate for High Speed Packet Access (HSPA) creates a question in the Evolved Packet Core's basic topology. EPC architects know that the logical architecture of an EPC connection in the data plane is tower (eNodeB)-to-gateway-to-service. The gateway in this context is the place where mobility registration and service control meet address assignment and data network connectivity. Evolved Packet Core specifications, however, provide for the separation of the gateway into a serving gateway (SGW) and a packet data network (PDN) gateway, or PGW. This separation creates an EPC sub-network of tunnels where Quality of Service (QoS) and traffic management are more directly under the control of the service control logic (such as IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS). This capability can be used to provide low-latency transport for TDM being transported over LTE facilities. 3G/4G Evolved Packet Core migration and integration planning For migration planning, it is convenient to view the mobile service elements of 3G and 4G services by pairing elements roughly according to function. 3G circuit-mode connections used for voice can be simply tunneled or carried as noted above using parallel TDM/ATM or integrated pseudowires over Ethernet or IP. 3G packet traffic handling is where the tightest integration between the mobile service elements and backhaul strategies must be considered. A good starting point is to consider the ultimate 4G logical model of mobile service elements and how they integrate with the 3G model. The Serving GPRS Support Nodes (SGSN) and Gateway GPRS Support Nodes (GGSN) relationship in 3G corresponds to the "trio" of Mobility Management Entity (MME)/SGW/PGW in LTE's EPC. The question, then, is whether the 3G and 4G elements are interconnected or integrated, which will depend on each operator's 4G architecture. Mainstream network equipment vendors support three basic models for providing mobile service elements in Evolved Packet Core: For any of these models, 3G and 4G functionality can be provided either independently or hosted in a single device. The latter solution is optimal where there will be considerable 4G deployment, where 3G elements are older (and thus represent less asset displacement cost), and where service evolution to 4G is expected to be rapid. Where it's not feasible to replace SGSN/GGSN functionality with a dual 3G/4G/EPC node set (MME/SGW/PGW), the only option is to link the 3G elements with the 4G network to combine the traffic. Where integrated fiber backhaul connects tower sites with both 3G and 4G radio access networks (RANs), the use of integrated functionality for 3G/4G elements is much preferred because all traffic will emerge from backhaul at the same point. Where operators are integrating 4G mobile elements into packet edge devices, it may be difficult or impossible to support both 3G and 4G missions on the same node because of constraints in 3G support by packet edge cards. Because of the flexibility that packet-edge hosting of EPC components offers, it is possible to host EPC components at the edge adjacent to the location of the 3G SGSN/GGSN that must be connected, and thus to reduce handling and latency. Aiming for flexible Evolved Packet Core deployment The most flexible approach would be to treat all of the Evolved Packet Core elements (MME, SGW, PGW) as logical entities that can be combined and hosted on available equipment in a variety of ways as network service demands evolve. This could allow operators to align the EPC components with current 3G elements and to create tunnels between 3G and EPC for packet traffic (UMTS Terrestrial Radio Access Network, or TRAN, traffic) where appropriate. As voice, data or all traffic evolves off of the 3G network, the location of the logical functions could be revised by changing the hosting points. Many mobile operators and planners still think in terms of discrete devices when they think of mobile service elements, but that trend is reversing as operators understand the flexibility and operations benefits of having their packet edge devices host EPC roles. If that hosting is further enhanced by a "logical EPC" capability to permit rapid reconfiguration of the relationship between the EPC and the underlying metro/core network, the result is a structure that adapts not only to the evolution from 3G to 4G, but also to the changes in traffic and services needs that will inevitably come in a mature 4G market.